Overall Results

(These are normalized scores*)
Rookie
1.Ibrahim Itani(Rk)(97.62)
2.Julian Lach(Rk)(80.24)
3.Joseph Garcia(Rk)(70.95)
4.Justis Evans(Rk)(66.19)
5.Ryan Van billiard(Rk)(61.67)
6.Spencer Reynen Reynen(Rk)(46.19)
7.Luke Reed(Rk)(44.76)
8.Nehemiah Peterson(Rk)(43.33)
9.Dawson Schaefer(Rk)(37.62)
10.SAMMY GANO(Rk)(0)

5a
1.Tyler Severance(Sp)(97.08)
2.Miguel Correa(Sp)(91.11)
3.Yoshi Mikamoto(Sp)(60.14)
4.Shannon Jackson(In)(52.58)
5.Baldo Gonzalez(In)(47.06)
6.Dylan Benharris(In)(43.66)
7.Tyler Goldenberg(In)(42.43)
8.Evan Nagao(33.44)
9.McLeod Benson(In)(20.67)
10.Daniel Mizell(In)(19.61)
11.Jason Tran(In)(18.32)
12.Alex Hattori(In)(13.31)
13.Paolo Bueno(In)(10.8)

4a
1.Anthony Rojas(Sp)(98.75)
2.Yoshi Mikamoto(Sp)(81.89)
3.Eric Ngu(Sp)(56.09)
4.Joseph Harris(Sp)(34.97)
5.Daniel Mizell(In)(28.45)
6.Dylan Benharris(In)(13.92)
7.Alex Hattori(In)(6.67)

3a
1.Patrick Borgerding(Sp)(82.68)
2.the yath(Sp)(77.25)
3.Yoshi Mikamoto(Sp)(50.18)
4.Alex Hattori(In)(44.37)
5.Anthony Rojas(Sp)(37.47)
6.Connor Swan(In)(14.45)
7.Tyler Severance(Sp)(7.17)
8.Elliot Ostergaard(In)(4.86)

2a
1.Patrick Mitchell(Sp)(97.49)
2.Joseph Harris(Sp)(86.13)
3.Yoshi Mikamoto(Sp)(82.11)
4.Adam Dennehy(Sp)(79.68)
5.aaron goold(Sp)(61.69)
6.Evan Nagao(Sp)(40.75)
7.Alex Hattori(In)(7.06)

1a
1.David Ung(Sp)(88.35)
2.Tyler Rose(Sp)(86.67)
3.Anthony Rojas(Sp)(84.33)
4.Tyler Goldenberg(In)(78.82)
5.Miguel Correa(Sp)(68.91)
6.Evan Nagao(Sp)(53.83)
7.Eric Ngu(Sp)(48.98)
8.Tyler Severance(Sp)(47.41)
9.John Huber(Sp)(45.86)
10.Joseph Harris(Sp)(41.17)
11.Connor Swan(In)(38.36)
12.Patrick Borgerding(Sp)(35.86)
13.James Reed(In)(35.2)
14.Tan Huynh(17.86)
15.Daniel Mizell(In)(4)

*This year we normalized the judges' scores from top to bottom, per division. That means that the highest score a judge gave became 100% and the lowest score they gave became 0% and all other scores were arranged proportionally between those two.

We do this to keep a judge who gives everyone 90 to 100 from being 5 times more mathematically heavy than a judge who gives 18s and 20s.

The end result is relative scores that do not necessarily reflect the absolute scores. For example if one competitor got a "40" from every judge, but yet the other players all got 20s and 30s, he would have a "100" in the final. And conversely a player could have a "0" in the final tally even if all the judges gave him 50s. These numbers are relative, not absolute.